New Hampshire Proposes Ban on ‘Police State’

police-state-usa

With exception to arming the state’s National Guard, New Hampshire House Bill 407 — the Police Equipment and Community Engagement Act — would bar officials from possessing any military equipment “not readily available in an open national commercial market.”

New Hampshire’s HB407 would effectively bring the state’s participation in the 1033 program to an end. The program has supplied New Hampshire localities with more than $6,000,000 in military gear, the legislation’s text states. However…

“New Hampshire cities and towns are required to repair and maintain this additional military grade hardware that consumes limited town and city funds that are needed for other functions.”

In response to increasing police militarization in the US and the cost of doing so, legislation proposed in the New Hampshire state House would implement a ban on state and local officials obtaining or using certain military weaponry acquired from the Pentagon or other sources.


 
The militarization of state and local law enforcement agencies by federal programs which are dispensing “weapons and tactics of war, with almost no public discussion or oversight.” may be coming to an end in New Hampshire. While the state is certainly low in the overall rankings of state’s which might be considered ‘police states’, New Hampshire is saying ‘no more’.

Local police forces across the United States have benefited from the militarized mindset of the post-9/11, “war on terror” era, as wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and funding from the likes of the US Department of Homeland Security have resulted in a mass proliferation of military-grade weaponry.

One way the US government distributes combat gear to local police departments is through the US Department of Defense’s 1033 program, in which the Pentagon offers hundreds of millions of dollars of surplus military equipment to police forces throughout the US.

One major problem for the cities and towns who acquire these freebies from the US government is the extraordinary high cost of maintaining the equipment (at taxpayers expense).

New Hampshire has apparently come to the realization that a ‘police state’ is not necessary and it’s just not worth it to keep and maintain equipment and weaponry that’s meant for ‘war’…

 
Do you think that other states will adopt this attitude? Or only just a few (or just NH)?

Source: RT

31 Comments


Click here to vote for MSB -Top Prepper Website

  1. SpudWeb January 29, 2015
    • Sgt Bill January 29, 2015
      • Spooky January 29, 2015
        • Sgt Bill January 29, 2015
  2. Prairie Patriot January 29, 2015
  3. Perceval January 29, 2015
  4. Whisky Tango January 29, 2015
    • Kevin January 29, 2015
      • Jon January 29, 2015
        • Ben January 29, 2015
          • Stardust January 29, 2015
          • SpudWeb January 30, 2015
  5. Andy January 29, 2015
  6. He January 30, 2015
  7. sureshot January 30, 2015
  8. No More Bashing January 30, 2015
  9. Lynn at Wood Ridge January 30, 2015
    • Ken Jorgustin January 30, 2015
      • Lynn at Wood Ridge January 31, 2015
    • cossack55 January 30, 2015
  10. Ken Jorgustin January 30, 2015
    • Dangfox January 30, 2015
  11. article January 30, 2015
  12. Wolfgar January 30, 2015
    • Wolfgar January 31, 2015
  13. Texasgirl January 30, 2015
    • cossack55 January 30, 2015
  14. Texasgirl January 30, 2015
    • cossack55 January 30, 2015
  15. WI PREPPER January 31, 2015
    • Wolfgar January 31, 2015
Click here to vote for MSB -Top Prepper Website

Visit our TERMS OF USE & Comment Policy

For off-topic discussion, visit the latest:
'Weekly Preparedness' post

For the most recent comments from all articles:
'Recent Comments' page

Leave a Reply

Email optional - will not be published
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!