Pole Shift Data Coverup – 2012

magnetic-north-pole-2012

The NOAA National Geophysical Data Center has updated (revised – massaged) their magnetic north pole-shift positional data and has projected the location of the magnetic north pole through 2015. The pole shift continues to race along in the same direction since it dramatically accelerated back in the mid 1990’s. But…

NOAA made some significant and apparently linear changes to the pole location data going back to the years 2001 through 2010. The most noticeable result of the changes that they made was an overall linear slow down of the shift during the past decade, although still at a high rate of speed. They have projected positional data through 2015 and have slowed the pace of movement each subsequent year from 30 miles (2012) to 24 miles (2015).

Survival Seed Vault – Heirloom Emergency Survival Seeds

No apparent reason for the change was listed. A 10 year change nonetheless! Given the fact that they suddenly changed their previously posted data of the previous decade to indicate a slower pole-shift progression, they are now able to project a slowing trend through 2015. The situation is beginning to look like one of their sister agencies, the USGS, who when they change their earthquake magnitude numbers, they always (95% of the time) revise them downward. The revisions made are nearly always in a ‘less alarming’ direction.

The following map shows the position of the magnetic north pole, and its shift since 1977. Read here for the past 400 years of magnetic north pole shift. Clearly it can be seen where the annual pole location begins to spread during the mid 1990’s when the acceleration rapidly increased.

pole-shift-magnetic-north-2012

The following image plot shows the comparison between the original magnetic north pole locations and now the new revised locations (2001 onward) from NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).

pole-shift-government-coverup

While this could be the result of a NOAA factoring error of some sort, one wonders why it wasn’t caught at any other time between 2001 and today. It took 10 years to find it? Hmmm…

Or, could this be a coverup to slow the progress of the messaging of the ongoing pole shift?

SAS Survival Handbook, Revised Edition

I suppose we won’t know the truth until the pole flip.

previous NOAA data revised NOAA data
Latitude Longitude year Latitude Longitude
80.815 -109.568 2001 80.772 -109.478
81.268 -110.89 2002 81.225 -110.807
81.714 -112.344 2003 81.67 -112.268
82.193 -114.095 2004 82.149 -114.026
82.623 -115.892 2005 82.578 -115.83
83.127 -118.178 2006 82.996 -117.828
83.579 -120.578 2007 83.443 -120.273
83.981 -123.067 2008 83.838 -122.814
84.37 -125.881 2009 84.218 -125.681
84.742 -129.077 2010 84.548 -128.62
2011 84.86 -131.91
2012 85.154 -135.594
2013 85.396 -139.28
2014 85.618 -143.339
2015 85.791 -147.264

Source: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/

Note this author does not know for certain if NOAA themselves changed the numbers, or if the new data came from another source prior to NOAA processing. We also do not know the details as to why it was changed. This is simply an observation and commentary of the apparent new facts.

63 Comments


Modern Survival Blog is a Top Prepper Website

  1. chiller March 13, 2012 5:23 AM
    • Ken (MSB) March 13, 2012 8:02 AM
      • JoAnne October 12, 2013 4:55 PM
  2. DC March 13, 2012 3:44 PM
    • shoeupon March 24, 2012 5:52 PM
      • Ken March 24, 2012 6:10 PM
      • Wild Bill June 18, 2015 1:24 AM
      • Trimman August 13, 2017 4:04 AM
    • Mortimer April 19, 2012 9:39 PM
    • George Eaton August 18, 2012 1:20 AM
  3. Stormey March 14, 2012 10:22 AM
    • George Eaton August 18, 2012 1:26 AM
  4. William March 15, 2012 1:41 AM
    • Adrian Kerton June 29, 2012 3:26 AM
  5. Rodrick March 15, 2012 2:26 PM
  6. Archie1954 March 24, 2012 3:20 PM
    • Ken March 24, 2012 3:40 PM
    • George Eaton August 18, 2012 1:31 AM
  7. Duane April 13, 2012 4:30 PM
    • George Eaton August 15, 2012 12:22 AM
  8. Chris April 18, 2012 10:38 PM
  9. Kawika Mac April 25, 2012 10:42 AM
    • Halfkin April 25, 2012 2:52 PM
  10. Cassandra April 28, 2012 8:25 PM
  11. christine May 6, 2012 11:24 PM
  12. Goncalo Botelho May 15, 2012 8:32 PM
    • Ken May 15, 2012 8:59 PM
  13. Peder June 17, 2012 2:02 PM
    • Ken June 18, 2012 7:35 AM
      • DAT November 20, 2012 2:41 AM
    • George Eaton August 15, 2012 12:15 AM
      • Ken August 15, 2012 7:37 AM
  14. Phil dinello June 18, 2012 2:05 PM
    • Ken June 18, 2012 7:43 PM
  15. Curious George July 19, 2012 4:06 AM
  16. fast Artie August 17, 2012 2:33 PM
    • George Eaton August 18, 2012 1:43 AM
  17. NoDFs September 4, 2012 10:27 PM
  18. sixpense September 5, 2012 1:34 PM
    • nobody November 7, 2012 10:48 PM
      • Dylan November 27, 2012 9:06 AM
  19. midwestguy October 20, 2012 10:52 AM
    • Ken (ModernSurvivalBlog) October 20, 2012 11:21 AM
    • George Eaton October 20, 2012 12:40 PM
      • Ken (ModernSurvivalBlog) October 20, 2012 12:53 PM
  20. jeb December 31, 2012 6:11 PM
    • George Eaton January 1, 2013 3:35 PM
      • Ken (MSB) January 1, 2013 5:06 PM
  21. mundi011 January 5, 2013 4:51 PM
  22. George Eaton January 7, 2013 1:12 AM
  23. Hadi (Germany) January 12, 2013 9:28 AM
    • Ken (MSB) January 13, 2013 12:16 PM
  24. Hadi(Germany) January 13, 2013 1:26 PM
  25. Ray Graham February 22, 2013 2:51 PM
  26. Wc kittell April 15, 2013 9:27 AM
  27. Chris June 15, 2013 10:45 PM
  28. Thomas August 19, 2013 2:22 PM
  29. Stryder January 8, 2014 8:15 PM
  30. Rob M May 21, 2014 4:52 PM
  31. It's gonna be what it's gonna be September 25, 2014 12:50 PM
  32. Ray G February 28, 2016 9:31 PM
  33. green jeffrey May 1, 2016 8:06 PM
  34. Tom August 28, 2016 7:44 PM
Vote for MSB -Top Prepper Website

Read our Comment Policy

For off-topic discussion, visit the latest:
'Weekly Preparedness' post

For the most recent comments from all articles:
'Recent Comments' page

Leave a Reply

Email optional - will not be published