USA Urban Areas List and Population

Based on 2020 census data, and updated urban area definition, approximately 80% of the US population technically live in an urban area. That leaves about 20% who technically live in rural areas. I find that to be quite interesting. Here’s some statistics and information about USA urban areas, lists, names, visual graphs, population, and source links.

According to data for, as of 2020, there were (rounded) 268 million Americans living in urban classified areas. A quick check of the US population today (early 2023), there are 334 million people living in the United States.

Urban areas are clusters of development that meet a minimum population density threshold. Here’s the updated technical definition:

Urban Areas Criteria
Q: What is the definition of an urban area?
A: Urban areas represent densely developed territory, and encompass residential, commercial, and
other nonresidential urban land uses. Each urban area must encompass at least 2,000 housing units or
at least 5,000 people. This is a change from the previous minimum of 2,500 people which had been in
place since the 1910 Census.

Urban areas are defined primarily based on housing unit density measured at the census block level.
Three housing unit densities are applied during the delineation process:

  • Initial urban core: at least 425 housing units persquare mile. Based on the national average of
    2.6 people per occupied housing unit, this density threshold is similar to the 1,000 people per
    square mile used in 2000 and 2010 when delineating initial urban cores.
  • Remainder of urban area: at least 200 housing units per square mile. This is similar to the 500
    people per square mile density used for the 2000 and 2010 Censuses, based on the national
    average of 2.6 people per occupied housing unit.
  • At least one high-density nucleus of at least 1,275 housing units per square mile required for
    qualification. This ensures that each urban area contains a high-density nucleus typical of what
    one would expect to find within an urban area. In addition to the change in minimum thresholds
    for qualification and the change to use of housing unit density, the Census Bureau also will no
    longer distinguish between urbanized areas of 50,000 or more people and urban clusters of less
    than 50,000 people.
(source PDF from

I downloaded a spreadsheet that lists all 2,645 urban areas in the US. Then I started playing with the numbers, and illustrating them with charts and graphs. Here are some interesting statistical results:

Nearly 30% of all the people living in urban areas live in just 10 of them.

Nearly 70% of all people living in urban areas live in the Top 100.

82% of urbanites live in the Top 250, while nearly 90% live in the Top 500 urban areas.

Here’s an interesting representation urban areas map of the contiguous United States. I came across it during my research. I like the map because it proportionally shows where people live within all of the urban areas (size of the circles).

Image source credit: Dan Malouff (transportation planner for Arlington and an adjunct professor at George Washington University).

And here’s a list of the Top 100 urban areas in the United States, and their population, where nearly 70% or all the urbanites live…

New York–Jersey City–Newark, NY–NJ 19,426,449
Los Angeles–Long Beach–Anaheim, CA 12,237,376
Chicago, IL–IN 8,671,746
Miami–Fort Lauderdale, FL 6,077,522
Houston, TX 5,853,575
Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington, TX 5,732,354
Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD 5,696,125
Washington–Arlington, DC–VA–MD 5,174,759
Atlanta, GA 4,999,259
Boston, MA–NH 4,382,009
Phoenix–Mesa–Scottsdale, AZ 3,976,313
Detroit, MI 3,776,890
Seattle–Tacoma, WA 3,544,011
San Francisco–Oakland, CA3,515,933
San Diego, CA 3,070,300
Minneapolis–St. Paul, MN 2,914,866
Tampa–St. Petersburg, FL 2,783,045
Denver–Aurora, CO 2,686,147
Riverside–San Bernardino, CA 2,276,703
Baltimore, MD 2,212,038
Las Vegas–Henderson–Paradise, NV 2,196,623
St. Louis, MO–IL 2,156,323
Portland, OR–WA 2,104,238
San Antonio, TX 1,992,689
Sacramento, CA 1,946,618
Orlando, FL 1,853,896
San Juan, PR 1,844,410
San Jose, CA 1,837,446
Austin, TX 1,809,888
Pittsburgh, PA 1,745,039
Cleveland, OH 1,712,178
Indianapolis, IN 1,699,881
Cincinnati, OH–KY 1,686,744
Kansas City, MO–KS 1,674,218
Columbus, OH 1,567,254
Virginia Beach–Norfolk, VA 1,451,578
Charlotte, NC–SC 1,379,873
Milwaukee, WI 1,306,795
Providence, RI–MA 1,285,806
Jacksonville, FL 1,247,374
Salt Lake City, UT 1,178,533
Nashville-Davidson, TN 1,158,642
Raleigh, NC 1,106,646
Richmond, VA 1,059,150
Memphis, TN–MS–AR 1,056,190
Oklahoma City, OK 982,276
Hartford, CT 977,158
Louisville/Jefferson County, KY–IN 974,397
Buffalo, NY 948,864
Bridgeport–Stamford, CT–NY 916,408
New Orleans, LA 914,531
Tucson, AZ 875,441
El Paso, TX–NM 854,584
Honolulu, HI 853,252
Omaha, NE–IA 819,508
McAllen, TX 779,553
Bradenton–Sarasota–Venice, FL 779,075
Birmingham, AL 774,956
Albuquerque, NM 769,837
Tulsa, OK 722,810
Fresno, CA 717,589
Rochester, NY 704,327
Charleston, SC 684,773
Dayton, OH 674,046
Mission Viejo–Lake Forest–Laguna Niguel, CA 646,843
Colorado Springs, CO 632,494
Baton Rouge, LA 631,326
Allentown–Bethlehem, PA–NJ 621,703
Ogden–Layton, UT 608,857
Grand Rapids, MI 605,666
Cape Coral, FL 599,242
Knoxville, TN 597,257
Albany–Schenectady, NY 593,142
Columbia, SC 590,407
Provo–Orem, UT 588,609
Bakersfield, CA 570,235
New Haven, CT 561,456
Des Moines, IA 542,486
Akron, OH 541,879
Concord–Walnut Creek, CA 538,583
Temecula–Murrieta–Menifee, CA 528,991
Palm Bay–Melbourne, FL 510,675
McKinney–Frisco, TX 504,803
Wichita, KS 500,231
Toledo, OH–MI 497,952
Harrisburg, PA 490,859
Worcester, MA–CT 482,085
Little Rock, AR 461,864
Madison, WI 450,305
Spokane, WA 447,279
Reno, NV–CA 446,529
Springfield, MA–CT 442,145
Port St. Lucie, FL 437,745
Boise City, ID 433,180
Augusta-Richmond County, GA–SC 431,480
Denton–Lewisville, TX 429,461
Bonita Springs–Estero, FL 425,675
Winston-Salem, NC 420,924
Phoenix West–Goodyear–Avondale, AZ 419,946
Kissimmee–St. Cloud, FL 418,404

I found the following map to be fascinating. It’s a PDF (14 MB) file that you can really zoom in on, which shows all of the various ‘urban areas’. It’s too big to paste into this article, but you can look at it or download yourself from this link at

Why do I find all this interesting?

Well, for a number of reasons. One of them being that we talk about (occasionally here on the blog) the varying risks/system-risks associated with living in population-dense regions. Seeing it visualized, reading the statistics about where the majority of people live, it sheds light on many things.

For example, the fact that politics and subsequent laws and governance of such urban areas do highly influence and often dictate those of rural regions (because most people live in urban areas). Lifestyles and politics can be, and often are, very different between urban areas and rural. High population densities create unique problems and issues, whereas rural folks will typically ‘get along’ without an overabundance of oversight.

And of course, should there ever be systemic breakdowns of infrastructure, urban areas will be the first to hit-the-fan. And right quickly. In my view, it is unnatural to live so tightly packed together. But I do understand how and why it is. Anyway, this has simply been another presentation of perspective on population and where people live…

Another source link:

[ Read: Timeline Of Events Following A Long Term Grid Down Catastrophe ]


  1. I don’t even see New Mexico on that map HAHAHA
    OK think on this one, during the Great Depression those numbers are reversed, most folks lived on farms and mostly raised their own foods.
    And NO That Beef Steak does come from a farm/ranch. Most think it comes from a Plastics Plant manufactured in a plastic wrapper.
    If/When the $hit hits the fan, were all in trouble.

  2. I find this horribly depressing. When the inevitable collapse finally comes, all those people are going to be running around, desperate, freezing and starving. People in the cities are not preppers. I think I might be the only one. I see city people as basically large children, especially the younger generations. They are breathtakingly helpless. They don’t know where their food comes from. Many of them have never climbed a tree. Never caught a fish. Wouldn’t know what to do with it if they could catch one. Can’t hammer a nail. Can’t shoot. Can’t cook. Can’t darn a sock. I know a guy who didn’t know that wood has directional grain. He thought you could split wood by just chopping at it any old way. I’m not making this up. Another guy I know told me he planted “a ten-inch long row of tomatoes.” I was struck dumb. The city counsel where I live passed a bylaw allowing back-yard chickens. When the chicken gets old and stops laying you can’t just kill it and put it in the pot. You have to take it to the vet and have it put to sleep. These people are living all around me. If something bad happens… Must try not to panic…

  3. Here is something interesting that happened here during the beginning of the Big C lockdown. All the farmlands were hit with thieves out here. They broke into sheds, barns, shop buildings, vehicles for anything they could get there grubby hands on. (Luckily not us, but maybe our GSDs had something to do with that). There was no crime in the suburbs and small towns to speak of. Seems like they directly headed out as far as they could, even stealing fuel from farm equipment. Sort of surprised us all out here that we were targeted first. The majority were located and caught because they stupidly burgled RR equipment. Brought the Feds in. Good lesson for us tho. Stepped up multiple layers of lighting and security items, including fences, lights, locks, etc. And love those GSDs! Best ever!

      1. Kula, just saw your reply. We are 20 miles from a tiny town (with our post office), 40 miles from anything ‘suburban’, and about 90 miles from a major city. Mostly meth-heads.

  4. Let them stay in the cities and live in the twilight zone. Austin Texas has become extremely liberal and deserves the survival correction that is coming. Since graduating from UT, I have seen that city become totally dependent on government handouts. And now Austin is getting filled up with California escapees.
    I wonder how many folks on this site have seen their part of a favorite city/state get over-run by the hordes? Rant over!

    1. I’m with you about Austin. Loved it in the mid-seventies, then moved there in mid-eighties. Participated heavily in the music scene. Left 15 years ago when the traffic, noise, crime and commies took over.

      Isolated small community in the Ozarks is just right.

        1. Robin and Jade, Where were you when we lived in the Ozarks for 20 plus years? During Y2-k we had a very small group. We lived on the Missouri side. People in the Ozarks, for the most-part, know how to take care of themselves. I bet someone on here bought one of our places where we installed a Hardy out-door furnace and wood cook stoves.
          Can’t wait until they try to take those outdoor heating sources away from those in the Ozarks and other rural areas that have used them successfully for a life-time. I still look at property there on line from time to time. You have to know your areas there to avoid the “not so good ole boys”.

  5. No Joke:
    Been in my area since 1981, DRO Colorado WAS a great little town.
    Now it’s a POS city of those exact transports you mentioned.
    I refuse to even go there anymore.
    And yes hundreds and hundreds of homeless have taken over much of the city.
    Very sad to watch such a wonder area being ruined.

  6. NW Gal, re “So, I’m trying to figure out what’s happening to the thousands who are crossing our borders daily.” More than half of all illegals in the US are from Mexico. Another 20% are from Central and South America. About 15% are from Asia. They mostly live in 20 urban areas – New York, Los Angeles, Houston, and Dallas-Ft. Worth having the most. Then San Francisco, San Jose, Riverside, San Diego, Seattle, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Denver, Austin, Chicago, Atlanta, Miami, Charlotte, DC, Philadelphia, and Boston in no particular order. There is a bungee factor to where they go – mostly to where they’ve been before or already have friends, relatives, or former neighbors. They also go where there are large Spanish-speaking (or other native tongue) populations so they can blend in and feel at home. Even though there are some red states represented on this list, the cities are all very blue. We’re seeing a backlash from those cities now, so the times they may be a changin’.

  7. NW Gal, You ask how the illegals are surviving. The vast majority of illegal aliens in the US entered legally, with temporary visas. They came mostly to visit family, go to school, shop, or work temporarily. When they didn’t leave at the end of their permitted stay here they became illegal. By that time most of them had established a home here. They are staying with relatives, babysitting, working in the vast underground economy, working in agriculture, etc. Except for community-based services like K-12 schooling, they are mostly not on the federal dole. The ones crossing illegally who are then permitted to stay while their fraudulent asylum applications and subsequent legal processes take a decade to finalize are getting some funding. They are the ones that are bankrupting the “sanctuary” cities and states – but only those that pass out assistance like candy on Halloween. Trick-or-Treat suckers! I feel for the poor Americans living near the southern border. For them, it’s an invasion under the rainbow/open-border flag of the leftists and all those who didn’t vote to stop the Ds who were firmly on this path.

  8. Really? 200 housing units or 500 people per square mile to be considered urban? A more reasonable measure would probably show that at least 90% of people in the US live in an urban environment. The data doesn’t define suburban areas, goes straight from urban to rural. As Ken pointed out, the urbanites get to dictate to everyone else how to live, and by golly do they always try. I can’t wait for summer so I can go gold panning and try to not think about it.

    1. We have people in Canada who live in the north, in cabins, in the bush, in the middle of nowhere. Now Trudeau has decided to prohibit their hunting rifles, even old SKS rifles, which is all some can afford. Those people need their guns, and most of them probably won’t even know that they have been turned into criminals. What’s next, no hunting? No fishing? No campfires? No gold panning? No picking flowers? With the support of the majority of texting, latte-sipping, woke liberals in the cities, almost anything might be possible.

      1. yea, you pretty much listed a small part of the agenda.
        What’s left after people are force into gov housing and mega cities agenda 2021/2030
        “they” just need to set the trend.

        I have never liked being around large groups/crowds of people.

      2. I remember reading through the list of some of the rifles that the liberal government was planning on prohibiting, the Ruger#1 was on it. Really?, a single shot rifle? Seems that it sometimes comes in calibers that are too powerful or some such bullish!t. There was enough of an uproar that they’ve walked back on some of that, but you know they’ll try again. 90% of Canada’s population lives within a hundred miles of the US border, but they make the rules for the rest of us

        1. Speculation they added many guns intentionally that shouldn’t be on it so when pro gun people make enough of a stink about them the libs take them off the list making it look like we got a concession/won a pointless argument.
          then the “law” isn’t so bad.
          all bs

  9. Another weird phenomenon is the wind farms that the urbanites mandate upon the rural areas covering vast areas with the kinetic mayhem and blinking lights are not where they are needed, in the urban areas. The media mental programming of the population is attempting to link wind farms with the purity of rural life. Any media depiction of a wind turbine is shown as positive rural serf experience for an urbanite to utilize in their electric cars. None of the wind farm maps overlap any urban areas, yet the wind farms are an extension of urban dystopia.

Leave a Reply